Assorted Materials: Johnny Ryan

“OPENNESS”: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society (forthcoming, 2010)

The book has been submitted to the publisher on schedule!…

The Internet is a centrifugal force, user driven and open. These three characteristics have asserted themselves throughout  its history. Understanding them is the key to adapting to the new global commons, a political and media system in flux, and the future of competitive creativity.

Here’s a post about the Big Idea at the heart of the book

Samples of the subjects:

The contents page looks like this:

—PHASE I: DISTRIBUTED NETWORK, CENTRIFUGAL IDEAS—
Chapter 1. A CONCEPT BORN IN THE SHADOW OF THE NUKE
Chapter 2. THE MILITARY EXPERIMENT
Chapter 3. THE ESSENCE OF THE INTERNET
Chapter 4. COMPUTERS BECOME CHEAP, FAST, AND COMMON
—PHASE II: EXPANSION—
Chapter 5. THE HOI POLLOI CONNECT
Chapter 6. COMMUNITIES  BASED ON INTEREST, NOT PROXIMITY
Chapter 7. FROM MILITARY NETWORKS TO THE GLOBAL INTERNET
Chapter 8. THE WEB!
Chapter 9. A PLATFORM FOR TRADE AND THE PITFALLS OF THE DOT COM
—PHASE III: THE EMERGING ENVIRONMENT p. 105Chapter 10. WEB 2.0 AND THE RETURN TO THE ORAL TRADITION—
Chapter 11. NEW AUDIENCES, THE FOURTH WALL, AND EXTRUDED MEDIA
Chapter 12. TWO WAY POLITICS
Chapter 13. PROMISE AND PERIL

This book will take the reader on a path through some of the most interesting events and documents of the last century. A few samples: wargame-style briefings outlining nuclear exchange scenarios presented to President Kennedy, memoranda from the Obama transition team in 2008, scientific proposals for resilient communications networks developed at RAND in the early 1960s, records of the US Air Force’s increasing reliance on statistics and research & development during WWII, Warran Buffet’s I-told-you-so letter to shareholders in the aftermath of the dot com bust, startling statistics of growth in value of eBay sales per year, schematics of Steve Wozniak’s Apple I computer… This book will be not only a history, but like all good histories, may say where we are bound in the future.

I’ve spoken to some interesting people recently, including Vint Cerf, Leonard Kleinrock, Steve Crocker, Robert Cailliau, Bob Metcalfe, Dave Crocker, Heidi Heiden, Shih-Pau Yen (inventor of Gopher), Bill Thompson, Gregor BailarRalph Lee Smith (author of “Wired Nation” in 1970), Brian Pinkerton (search engine innovator), Gordon Bell, and Phil Madsen (man behind Jesse Ventura’s Internet driven 1998 campaign), Thomas Bruce (creator of Cello, the first PC web browser), Alan Emtage (inventor of Archie), Perry Pei Wei (creator of the first Unix WWW browser), Andrew Weinreich (founder of the first social network, sixdegrees.com), and Josh Tauberer, founder of GovTrack.us, Justin Williams (activist against the App Store NDA policy), Netfrack (the first MP3 pirate), Steven M. Bellovin (one of the founders of Usenet), Carlye AdlerMarc Benioff. A range of people including Peter Kirstein, Howard Rheingold, Micah Sifry, Nick Yee, have helped with sources. The RAND Corporation have kindly permitted the reproduction of Paul Baran’s diagram on distributed networking.

The ideas in this book are have benefited from the insights of thought, business, and policy leaders who participated at the IIEA Digital Future Group since October 2007, including Timothy Wu, Viviane Reding (European Commissioner for Media & Information Society), Larry Sanger (co-founder of Wikipedia), Peter Fleischer (Chief Privacy Counsel of Google Inc.), H.E. Toomas Hendrik Ilves, Jonathan Zittrain, and US Congressman Rick Boucher.

[image: a selection of books on my shelf at the moment]

The publisher is Reaktion Press, an interesting publishing house that produces books like A Cultural History of Boxing – see The Economist’s review of that book here. They distribute in the US through the University of Chicago Press. According to Wikipedia, Reaktion was runner-up for the Sunday Times Small Publisher of the Year Award in 1996, 1997, and 1999, and was shortlisted in 2003

What I need are suggestions on the title. Last time I made the mistake of using a 17 word title. What is the 1 word that encapsulates the subject, possibly extending to 3 words? I think OPENNESSS is the element about which the Net’s history has often pivoted, and upon which future political, business, and social development in the digital environment may depend. Equally, the decentralising character of the Internet and its flattening of hierarchies and empowerment of individuals evokes the image of the CENTRIFUGE. Any ideas, comment below. I’m considering one of the following four:

  • OPENNESS: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society
  • CENTRIFUGE: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society
  • INTERNET: the centrifugal force of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society
  • A history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society

See a note here about the word ‘Openness’, which has a little controversy surrounding it in some circles…

[image: my desk in Cambridge]

35 Responses to "“OPENNESS”: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society (forthcoming, 2010)"

Looking forward to it! Be interested to hear what Vint Cerf said!

Neil

Once byted , twice shy!

Michael – That has a certain something to it… but I’ll keep looking

New title idea: ‘Centrifuge: the history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of society, politics, and business’.

More and more the idea of the Internet as a centrifugal technology becomes compelling. Now, with just over two months until I give Reaktion my manuscript, the threads are coming together from all directions. It’s now clear that OPENNESS is the major theme, but that a slightly more developed concept, THE INTERNET AS A CENTRIFUGAL TECHNOLOGY, applies even more fittingly.

OPENNESS 2.0
If you use it for the title you owe me a tenner

Open Access: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society

Open Content: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society

Open Source: …

Open Circuit: …

Not very good, I know, but might give you some other idea.

Thanks – the tricky thing is to nail a title that doesnt limit the book to one specific subject (content, development, access etc.), but which also gets across the idea of things moving from the center and from hierarchy into a meshed network.

Yes, you obviously want to say to much in the title, my 2cents is that you should leave some things implicit (like lessons in politics, economy, sociology and the like) and go sexyer. If you like one of those, and you send me your book, i will be greatly honored (that said, these suggestions are freely given).

Openness and centrifugal forces: A people’s history of the Internet

or

Openness and centrifugal forces: An Internet’s history prolegomena for the future of society

or

Internet history’s lessons for the future: Openness and centrifugal forces as dynamics

note: if you want to incorporate the various dicipline of social science in one fell swoop, “social science” is the way to go. If it’s the “thing” in itself that you seek to name (i.e. the intransitive OBJECT of knowledge common to the various discipline of politics, economics and sociology), and not the organised knowledge of it (the transitive objects known discover by the various discipline and schools) then your best bet is “Society”.

Cheers

Thanks Nick – all good points. I’ll have a think over them.

“The Open Society and Its Creation”

“The Centre Doesn’t Hold”

What about a title that reflects that the internet’s ultimate influence is much broader than was thought originally? I’m wondering is there a quote equivalent to the famous statement from IBM in the 60s that there would only ever be a world market for four or five computers, or the many statements from Lord Kelvin that heavier than air flying machines/internal combustion engines/something else now wildly popular were impossible? If there is a similar it’ll-never-catch-on type quote for the ‘net, maybe it could be a source for the title?

“The Centre is Everywhere” – a nod to the saying that “God is a sphere the centre of which is everywhere and the circumference is nowhere” – and it hasn’t even been used for a book yet as far as I can see – http://www.google.ie/search?hl=en&q=%22the+centre+is+everywhere%22&meta=

“The Dead Centre”

Boom! You’ve got it. The Dead Centre. It says allot. But now, how to actually explain what that means in relation to the book? I want a politician, a lawyer, a businessman, a student – just just a computer networks person – to be able to lift up this book and know that it tells a story of how the world is changing for all, and why.

The Dead Centre: the history of the Internet and its lessons for the future.

I want to get across the idea of a new global commons, a political and media system in flux, and the future of competitive creativity.

Does “The Centre is Everywhere” with that subtitle get it across better?

Maybe dropping the definite article from “The Dead Centre” makes it punchier – something like “Dead Centre: the internet, its history, its future, our future.”

“The history of the internet, the future of everything.”

That last one was meant to a subtitle suggestion.

Or maybe you could steal this one – http://www.amazon.co.uk/Spend-Everywhere-Everyone-Always-Forever/dp/1861542798

Yes, has a certain kitchen sink quality to it that I must admit I cant avoid

Back, Forward, and Home: A history of the Internet

Our Virtual Home: A back and forth History of the Internet

Nikolai, it needs to get the centripetal idea across… the comments and text above give an idea of what this means.

Johnny,

Any further thoughts/final decision?

S

No, just trying to finish the thing! Has to be in by the 15th. Have a meeting at channel 4 by the way…

Cool – hope it goes well!

Hey Johnny,

Not sure if you’ve settled on a title just yet, but I’ve had a thought, one which I may or may not have mentioned to you before.

I put it forward as it seems to be exactly what it is, yet if you don’t have information in there explaining the term, the title might be out of place or redundant as well as people not quite knowing what it is on first glance which as you said is the utmost importance. That and you just might not like it.

EMERGENCE: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence

Appropraitely the internet is given as an engineered or cultural example of emergent behaviour. At its very basic, it is millions of bottom up processes all with few but distinct boundaries or rules, resulting in an unlikely but highly complex system with no centre, no head and is difficult to predict.

But as i said then you have to explain what the term means, or into how much depth you’d want to go, so it’s probably not very straight forward. But hey, it was just a thought.

———-

Also why limit yourself to just one word? I understand the desire not to have 17 of course and for it to be catchy, but why not two if it suits better.

OPEN INTERNET: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society

OPEN ORDER: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society

ORDER REDEFINED: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society

OPENNESS REDEFINED: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society

OPEN FUTURE: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society

OPEN CHANGE: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society

FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society

-This one above really gets across the extent of how the world has altered due to the rise of the internet.

All of that is most probably completely useless. No matter, best of luck and looking forward to seeing you on Friday on board the boat.

Al

Cheers Al. Emergence is a very interesting idea. It does not, however, describe the flattening and distribution that comes with the Internet. I need a word for that.

The idea of emergence is great. It really does the linking with the dead center/centrifugal forces. Above the idea of “order” seems great too. A mish-mash:

Centrifugal emergence: A history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of Order

might want to put an s to order(s) or not

Cheers and good luck

The Internet is for porn.

Could be a catchy title.

I don’t buy books with centrifuge in the title as a general rule.

BUT – I need to get the “future of business, politics, and culture” in there so that it’s clear that this is a practical book with material that a business strategist should read too.
So how do we fit all these elements together? Emergence / Openness / Flattening-Centrifugal-etc / Business-Politics-Culture.

Leave a Reply

About

I'm interested in 4 things: A) THE HISTORY OF THE INTERNET AND ITS LESSONS FOR THE FUTURE; B) Ireland’s Digital Competitiveness; c) the Political Impact of the Internet; D) How ideas - including violent political ideas - are communicated online.