The book has been submitted to the publisher on schedule!…
The Internet is a centrifugal force, user driven and open. These three characteristics have asserted themselves throughout its history. Understanding them is the key to adapting to the new global commons, a political and media system in flux, and the future of competitive creativity.
Here’s a post about the Big Idea at the heart of the book …
Samples of the subjects:
The contents page looks like this:
—PHASE I: DISTRIBUTED NETWORK, CENTRIFUGAL IDEAS—
Chapter 1. A CONCEPT BORN IN THE SHADOW OF THE NUKE
Chapter 2. THE MILITARY EXPERIMENT
Chapter 3. THE ESSENCE OF THE INTERNET
Chapter 4. COMPUTERS BECOME CHEAP, FAST, AND COMMON
—PHASE II: EXPANSION—
Chapter 5. THE HOI POLLOI CONNECT
Chapter 6. COMMUNITIES BASED ON INTEREST, NOT PROXIMITY
Chapter 7. FROM MILITARY NETWORKS TO THE GLOBAL INTERNET
Chapter 8. THE WEB!
Chapter 9. A PLATFORM FOR TRADE AND THE PITFALLS OF THE DOT COM
—PHASE III: THE EMERGING ENVIRONMENT p. 105Chapter 10. WEB 2.0 AND THE RETURN TO THE ORAL TRADITION—
Chapter 11. NEW AUDIENCES, THE FOURTH WALL, AND EXTRUDED MEDIA
Chapter 12. TWO WAY POLITICS
Chapter 13. PROMISE AND PERIL
This book will take the reader on a path through some of the most interesting events and documents of the last century. A few samples: wargame-style briefings outlining nuclear exchange scenarios presented to President Kennedy, memoranda from the Obama transition team in 2008, scientific proposals for resilient communications networks developed at RAND in the early 1960s, records of the US Air Force’s increasing reliance on statistics and research & development during WWII, Warran Buffet’s I-told-you-so letter to shareholders in the aftermath of the dot com bust, startling statistics of growth in value of eBay sales per year, schematics of Steve Wozniak’s Apple I computer… This book will be not only a history, but like all good histories, may say where we are bound in the future.
I’ve spoken to some interesting people recently, including Vint Cerf, Leonard Kleinrock, Steve Crocker, Robert Cailliau, Bob Metcalfe, Dave Crocker, Heidi Heiden, Shih-Pau Yen (inventor of Gopher), Bill Thompson, Gregor Bailar, Ralph Lee Smith (author of “Wired Nation” in 1970), Brian Pinkerton (search engine innovator), Gordon Bell, and Phil Madsen (man behind Jesse Ventura’s Internet driven 1998 campaign), Thomas Bruce (creator of Cello, the first PC web browser), Alan Emtage (inventor of Archie), Perry Pei Wei (creator of the first Unix WWW browser), Andrew Weinreich (founder of the first social network, sixdegrees.com), and Josh Tauberer, founder of GovTrack.us, Justin Williams (activist against the App Store NDA policy), Netfrack (the first MP3 pirate), Steven M. Bellovin (one of the founders of Usenet), Carlye Adler, Marc Benioff. A range of people including Peter Kirstein, Howard Rheingold, Micah Sifry, Nick Yee, have helped with sources. The RAND Corporation have kindly permitted the reproduction of Paul Baran’s diagram on distributed networking.
The ideas in this book are have benefited from the insights of thought, business, and policy leaders who participated at the IIEA Digital Future Group since October 2007, including Timothy Wu, Viviane Reding (European Commissioner for Media & Information Society), Larry Sanger (co-founder of Wikipedia), Peter Fleischer (Chief Privacy Counsel of Google Inc.), H.E. Toomas Hendrik Ilves, Jonathan Zittrain, and US Congressman Rick Boucher.
The publisher is Reaktion Press, an interesting publishing house that produces books like A Cultural History of Boxing – see The Economist’s review of that book here. They distribute in the US through the University of Chicago Press. According to Wikipedia, Reaktion was runner-up for the Sunday Times Small Publisher of the Year Award in 1996, 1997, and 1999, and was shortlisted in 2003
What I need are suggestions on the title. Last time I made the mistake of using a 17 word title. What is the 1 word that encapsulates the subject, possibly extending to 3 words? I think OPENNESSS is the element about which the Net’s history has often pivoted, and upon which future political, business, and social development in the digital environment may depend. Equally, the decentralising character of the Internet and its flattening of hierarchies and empowerment of individuals evokes the image of the CENTRIFUGE. Any ideas, comment below. I’m considering one of the following four:
See a note here about the word ‘Openness’, which has a little controversy surrounding it in some circles…
Once byted , twice shy!
OPENNESS 2.0
If you use it for the title you owe me a tenner
Open Access: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society
Open Content: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society
Open Source: …
Open Circuit: …
Not very good, I know, but might give you some other idea.
Yes, you obviously want to say to much in the title, my 2cents is that you should leave some things implicit (like lessons in politics, economy, sociology and the like) and go sexyer. If you like one of those, and you send me your book, i will be greatly honored (that said, these suggestions are freely given).
Openness and centrifugal forces: A people’s history of the Internet
or
Openness and centrifugal forces: An Internet’s history prolegomena for the future of society
or
Internet history’s lessons for the future: Openness and centrifugal forces as dynamics
note: if you want to incorporate the various dicipline of social science in one fell swoop, “social science” is the way to go. If it’s the “thing” in itself that you seek to name (i.e. the intransitive OBJECT of knowledge common to the various discipline of politics, economics and sociology), and not the organised knowledge of it (the transitive objects known discover by the various discipline and schools) then your best bet is “Society”.
Cheers
“The Open Society and Its Creation”
“The Centre Doesn’t Hold”
What about a title that reflects that the internet’s ultimate influence is much broader than was thought originally? I’m wondering is there a quote equivalent to the famous statement from IBM in the 60s that there would only ever be a world market for four or five computers, or the many statements from Lord Kelvin that heavier than air flying machines/internal combustion engines/something else now wildly popular were impossible? If there is a similar it’ll-never-catch-on type quote for the ‘net, maybe it could be a source for the title?
“The Centre is Everywhere” – a nod to the saying that “God is a sphere the centre of which is everywhere and the circumference is nowhere” – and it hasn’t even been used for a book yet as far as I can see – http://www.google.ie/search?hl=en&q=%22the+centre+is+everywhere%22&meta=
“The Dead Centre”
Does “The Centre is Everywhere” with that subtitle get it across better?
Maybe dropping the definite article from “The Dead Centre” makes it punchier – something like “Dead Centre: the internet, its history, its future, our future.”
“The history of the internet, the future of everything.”
That last one was meant to a subtitle suggestion.
Or maybe you could steal this one – http://www.amazon.co.uk/Spend-Everywhere-Everyone-Always-Forever/dp/1861542798
Back, Forward, and Home: A history of the Internet
Our Virtual Home: A back and forth History of the Internet
Johnny,
Any further thoughts/final decision?
S
Hey Johnny,
Not sure if you’ve settled on a title just yet, but I’ve had a thought, one which I may or may not have mentioned to you before.
I put it forward as it seems to be exactly what it is, yet if you don’t have information in there explaining the term, the title might be out of place or redundant as well as people not quite knowing what it is on first glance which as you said is the utmost importance. That and you just might not like it.
EMERGENCE: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence
Appropraitely the internet is given as an engineered or cultural example of emergent behaviour. At its very basic, it is millions of bottom up processes all with few but distinct boundaries or rules, resulting in an unlikely but highly complex system with no centre, no head and is difficult to predict.
But as i said then you have to explain what the term means, or into how much depth you’d want to go, so it’s probably not very straight forward. But hey, it was just a thought.
———-
Also why limit yourself to just one word? I understand the desire not to have 17 of course and for it to be catchy, but why not two if it suits better.
OPEN INTERNET: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society
OPEN ORDER: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society
ORDER REDEFINED: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society
OPENNESS REDEFINED: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society
OPEN FUTURE: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society
OPEN CHANGE: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society
FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE: a history of the Internet and its lessons for the future of business, politics, and society
-This one above really gets across the extent of how the world has altered due to the rise of the internet.
All of that is most probably completely useless. No matter, best of luck and looking forward to seeing you on Friday on board the boat.
Al
The Internet is for porn.
Could be a catchy title.
I don’t buy books with centrifuge in the title as a general rule.
1 | N Leyden
19 April 2009 at 12:08 pm
Looking forward to it! Be interested to hear what Vint Cerf said!
Neil